I know this is going to be a controversial (& technically challenging) topic, but I thought it was worth raising the point nevertheless.
delta.chat is a brilliant piece of software. Thanks to the full integration with the traditional email infrastructure (which enable a nearly seamless transition for new users), I foresee delta.chat to be actually successful as a viable FOSS alternative to WhatsApp and the like. This is great!!
However, I would argue that the name of the software (+ the current icon) are currently amongst the largest obstacles to a wider adoption.
To be direct: to a new user, ‘delta.chat’ sounds like either a scientific/highly technical tool or as an esoteric/religious/sectarian chat app, meant for a very specific audience. It does not appeal to the majority; it does not sound like a generic (and attractive) messaging app.
One can simply create a fork with a different more approachable to the masses name. As long as they keep the credits and refer to DeltaChat I don’t see any problem.
Like one could fork it and make all buttons bigger + a high contrast theme to make an App that is easier for Old People that can’t see that well anymore.
Another option would be a fork that has only easy language on the ui elements so for example refugees can use it to get familiar with their new home’s language without being too overwhelmed.
Or a fork with only emojis / symbols to be understood in different languages.
There is no limit in imagination for such purposeful forks.
Thanks for the praise and welcome Not sure if the name is the largest obstacle to adoption – it never came up as an issue in interviews or UX test sessions so far. People were more concerned about understanding what precisely makes delta different – so that notion of “delta” seems to be fitting