I created DeltaFans, a fully anonymous (and encrypted!) community experiment.
Once inside you will have a shared anonymous space, you can create new groups/threads and they will be accessible to the whole community, you can send messages anonymously or pseudo-anonymously if you set a nick for yourself. You can even make public read-only channels from your normal personal account and make it available in the community by creating a “broadcast list” and adding the community address as recipient
to use it you need to have the latest version of DeltaLab after you install or upgrade your DeltaLab, send me a message here and I will send you the invitation to the community
Actually the funding of the idea might be worthy to develop into a way of chat on shared place, using just one email account. User, access, else, might come about via datas and filters shared by each mail.
But that’s probably beyond delta-chat.
(in regard of anonymous: person «wonders» why there are there are less desired for authentic and resbonsible "experiments)
updated the post, now DeltaLab has support for anonymous communities in a more approachable way, you have unread messages counter, notifications and users can set a name and differentiate their messages from other people’s messages
it seems to me you are trying to imply something there, anonymity is a side effect of the way the community works, if you think you can do more “responsible experiments” maybe you should give it a try yourself…
Do common not prefer the cheat of not responsible, chargeable, for deeds…? It’s not the way of solving basic failure good adbenitz, not the way toward uprightness and right view.
The new community is basically just as anonymous like this forum. You can use your real name, but you don’t have to. It’s a great way to create a forum with little effort.
As told, much than great to see the technical potential, yet surely out of frame of DC but a forum solution, which would be worthy to follow up.
As for the intention: no praise but just blame, since increasing wrong view and destruction of upright relation, as maxist ideologies are always leading to such.
Samana, it seems like the moral sermons you spread widely in this forum’s threads are quite inappropriate. It would be nice if you stop blaming someone’s political views or other things related to personality, especially in topics that are not about it
Good Joe might mistaken ethic and moral with pulling, but that’s also common taken as other side around.
Maybe some see that forum solution also useful for those not trapped in pseudo-liberal and evil trap. Those who aren’t scared to go upright, show face and respect to give credits and sources.
If moral and ethic is seen as improper here, then there is no need to spend even a further minute, since one has to fear to part-take, at least being objected as such easily. And no, productivity doesn’t pardon unskilful ways and deeds.
(and encrypted!) community experiment.