Valued Delta-team, developer, user,
just as “feedback”, inspiration.
Expected:
If repeating what was sayed, in forwarding a post/message, it’s good custom to inform about origin, person, place. (Taken “laws”, thinking on autor-rights, even demanded)
Citing of chat and person (maybe even with link if having access to this chat, connection with particular person) would be expected.
Good, and proper (maybe even more importand), would a leave of an info that something was shared in a particular chat-room.
Actuall behaviour:
Although reciting of said is possible by forwarding, on the citing place no origin would be given, also no possibility to add it manual to a forwarded message.
Surely a “duty to destroy all traces”-laws challenge via “duty of calling author” here…
Pumped up the issue again here: Make message's text selectable - #9 by SamanaJohann
My person thinks that in combination with an invitation link to the origin chat (if enabled in settings (my person thinks it’s maybe similar like public profil, or profile accessibility on FB)) such would be a mile-stone toward growing and living chat possibility.
When ever setting “Invitation link in quotes” is activated, the quote does not only carry the author but also the chat incl. link to join.
Maybe good to have two opinions in settings. “Invitation link in quotes for chats”, “share of own contact in quotes by others”. If disabled, author and chat appear only as text (Account name, chat name, without link).
Surely a database challenge, yet not only to make DC not just a origin destroyer and merely immoral and even unlawful by forced destroying credits and origin, but also to open it up for prosperty.